Mario Kart 64
|
See terminology for explanations of terms.
Computers use addresses to jump through code. This works similar to a house number.
A typical N64 address: 0x80160158
In an N64 program, addresses begin at 0x80000000
. As you create code, data, and the like, the compiler will add onto this base number and assign variables to an address.
Replacing a variable with a hard-coded address grabs the value at that address.
Both would output 2
. This allows some trickery. Such as pointer math: print(0x800000004 + 0x80000004)
would output 7
. Pointers may be similarily influenced: &a + 4
results in 0x800000008
thus printing the value at b
.
The compiler may align
or offset variables to certain addresses. Generally, certain types of data is aligned to 0x10.
If c
were placed in a new file, the compiler would place c
at 0x80000010
and e
would be placed at 0x80000020
.
Data can take up tonnes of space:
The address of this could extend from 0x80000100
to 0x800000534
. However, you would not see data begin at 0x80000533
. The compiler generally aligns objects to 4, 8, 0xC, or 0x10. With the exception being when you're working with s16 and s8. If you have:
In a hexadecimal editor you may expect to see this: 000300000005
or 0x0003 0x00000005
But actually, it will be this:
The compiler aligned b
to the nearest 0x4. If there were two s16's then the blank 0x0000
will be used.
The maximum value of an s8 (0x00) is 0xFF or 255. 0xFF + 1 = 0x100
imagine this scenario:
If d
was set to 0x100, the final 0
would be written to the first bit of e
. This could result in an invalid float value or perhaps flipping the signedness of an s32 (from negative to positive and vice-versa).
Issues such as this could result in glitches or crashes. Once humble math calculating to immeasurable values.
In the below example, my_func writes a value at the fifth index which does not exist. This results in writing 5.0f into the next variable lkely resulting in a crash. Array overflows may be easy to miss in complex programs and sometimes only crash on rare occasion.
Code contains addresses too. Lets take a look at some example assembly:
Format: rom address (file on disc), ram address, machine-code, assembly, arguments/parameters
The lui, addiu, ori, etc.
are just representations of the machine-code. For example: 0x3C08800F
is what the cpu is actually running. Lets break down this one command: op-code, parameters
0x3C is the op-code (lui or load-upper-immediate) this command loads an address. The 08
tells the CPU to use the register t0
and the 0x800F
is the first-half of the address to load. So, in the register t0 (which is the size of an int: 0x00000000) the value 0x800F0000
is written.
Note that one machine-code command is the size of an int/s32/word. How do we load an address (which is the size of an int). There isn't enough room when you include the op-code and register: 0x3C08800F6990
. That no worky. As such, loading data at an address requires two commands. The first half of the address is called a hi and the second half is called a lo:
Now, we're going to add the offset: t0: 0x800F0000 + 0x6910 = 0x800F6910
. If you run the game and use a memory viewer at this location. You will quickly realize this region of data (it's actually .bss but lets not get into that), is the controller data. The data alters to reflect which controller buttons are pressed. So if I just wanted to read one of these values, the cpu will run two commands to put the address into the register. Then another command can read the address in that register to receive the value at that location. This value can be compared to see if the button is active. Ex. zero might mean not pressed, whereas one might mean pressed.
Now, earlier it was mentioned that code contains addresses. If I wanted to, I could do this: Jump to: 0x80000410
. Which would make the CPU start running code at that location. Or I could read the value that exists there: 0x2129FFF8
. Not sure what I might do with that number, but it does act like a normal number. In decimal it is: 556,400,632
. I could add and subtract to it (Which would likely crash the game if it tried to run that command after). Now, jumping to any code address in the middle of a function would almost certainly crash the game or result in strange behaviour. The purpose of this explanation is really to show that everything is just a bunch of numbers or values, represented by an address. Even the code itself.
For a more refined explanation of addresses and pointers its suggested to use the Googles. However, this explanation was written with the N64 in-mind.